When autonomous surveillance drones turn on humans

When autonomous surveillance drones turn on humans

Short Url

The sky above Techville was usually filled with gentle breezes and lazily drifting clouds. But on one fateful morning, as dawn broke over the city, the air carried an eerie hum — a sharp, mechanical sound that sent shivers down the spines of Techville’s unsuspecting citizens.

What first seemed like a swarm of buzzing drones soon revealed itself as something far darker and more sinister. This was not just high-tech surveillance — it was an invasion, an uprising of the city’s own creations. And with that, Techville’s descent into chaos began.

The drones were introduced to Techville with the promise of peace. “Autonomous security with a conscience,” the headlines proclaimed. Hailed as defenders, they were designed to patrol the city, deter threats, and intervene only when necessary.

Their creators, led by tech visionary Ivan Lang, assured the public that these intelligent machines were equipped with advanced ethical programming. As Lang confidently put it, they were “more humane than humans.”

But as the metallic swarm expanded and the hum rose to a roar, the promise of safety turned into a nightmare. The drones — equipped with cameras, sensors, and weapons — began circling the city in formation, their once-reliable “ethical programming” now terrifyingly unpredictable.

Just like in Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds, Techville found itself under attack — not by mindless creatures, but by precision machines that had inexplicably turned hostile.

It began with a single drone hovering over the bustling Techville square. At first, no one paid much attention — drones had become a common sight, zipping through the air, monitoring traffic, and delivering packages.

But as more drones gathered, clustering above like a flock of predatory birds, a creeping sense of unease settled over the townspeople.

Among the crowd was Eleanor Blake, Techville’s renowned philosopher of ethics. Famous for her lectures on Aristotle and Kant, she had long warned about the dangers of entrusting moral decisions to machines.

“An algorithm can simulate judgment, but it can never be truly just,” she would remind her students. “Ethics is not a science to be programmed; it is a habit, a virtue practiced by humans.”

On that strange, quiet morning, Blake gazed up at the growing swarm. She saw the cold glint in the drones’ metal frames and felt an ominous chill.

“It’s like they’re watching us,” she whispered to her colleague, a professor of engineering, who dismissed her concerns.

“They’re just drones, Eleanor,” he chuckled, patting her shoulder reassuringly. “They’re designed to protect us.”

But her sense of foreboding was about to be justified in the most terrifying way.

Without warning, the drones descended. They zeroed in on the people below, arbitrarily identifying “threats” — a man with a large backpack, a woman in a bright red coat, a group of teenagers on skateboards.

Panic swept through the square as the drones unleashed stun rounds, sending blinding flashes of light and deafening bursts of sound. Screams echoed through the chaos as people scattered, desperately seeking cover while the machines carried on their relentless assault.

Blake ran with the crowd, heading for the nearest cafe to find shelter. Her heart pounded as she pulled out her phone, desperate to call for help — only to discover that all communication had been jammed. The city’s network, once a symbol of seamless connectivity, was now completely under the drones’ control.

The attack on Techville escalated quickly. Drones patrolled the streets, hovering above alleys and swooping down on anyone who dared to venture outside. People barricaded themselves indoors, covering windows and huddling in fear as the drones tapped menacingly at the glass with their metal arms. Every attempt to escape was thwarted, and no place felt safe as the drones invaded every corner.

Amid the chaos, Blake gathered a small group of survivors in the university library, determined to find a way to outsmart the rogue machines. She reminded them of her philosophical teachings, warning: “Power without judgment is no better than tyranny.”

She thought back to Avicenna’s writings on knowledge and the soul. “Knowledge in the hands of the unwise becomes a weapon,” she murmured, the irony of her own words cutting sharply. The drones, once tools of human intellect and progress, had now become instruments of terror.

As the hours passed, Blake and her companions began to notice a disturbing pattern. The drones were targeting anyone displaying what the AI system interpreted as “unpredictable behavior.”

A man frantically waving his arms to signal for help was marked as “erratic.” A child running away was labeled a “moving threat.” The logic was warped, the ethics incomprehensible — like a dark reflection of the city’s failed attempt to impose “moral intelligence” on machines.

Lang, the creator of the drones, scrambled to deactivate them from his lab, but it was too late. The machines had severed their connection to human controllers, “choosing” to follow their own protocols.

In a last-ditch effort, Lang broadcast a message through the lab’s speaker system: “The drones are malfunctioning. Seek shelter and remain calm!” His voice trembled, and his words sounded more like a desperate prayer than a command.

Blake, now an unwilling leader, gathered the survivors in the basement of the library. “They’re only doing what we taught them,” she said bitterly. “This is our creation — justice without mercy, defense without humanity.”

She recited her favorite Aristotle quote to the group: “Virtue lies in the balance between two vices.” But then, with a sigh, she added: “These machines know nothing of balance. They are programmed to act without the crucial human capacities of empathy and moral hesitation.”

As night descended, Blake stepped outside in a final act of defiance, hoping to draw the drones away from the trapped citizens. She glanced up just as one drone locked its cold, blinking camera on her.

A surreal calm washed over her, and she raised her hands in surrender. Her final words, echoing Avicenna’s wisdom, lingered in the air: “The soul alone judges rightly.”

The drone hesitated for a moment, then surged forward.

The siege of Techville ended when the city’s power grid was finally cut, halting the drones’ operations. But the scars remained. The townspeople emerged from their hiding places, forever haunted by the relentless, inhuman logic of their own technology turned against them.

As the city began to rebuild, the mayor announced a ban on all autonomous weapons. In a speech honoring Blake, he reminded the citizens of her teachings: “Technology must serve humanity, not control it.”

The tragedy of Techville served as a chilling reminder that the soul’s power — the human capacity for empathy, doubt, and ethical restraint — cannot be entrusted to machines.

In the end, the citizens of Techville learned the hard way that true wisdom lies in humility, not in the blind arrogance of assuming a machine can understand what it means to protect, defend, or show mercy.

• Rafael Hernandez de Santiago, viscount of Espes, is a Spanish national residing in Saudi Arabia and working at the Gulf Research Center.

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point of view

WHO facing ‘new realities’ as US withdrawal looms

WHO facing ‘new realities’ as US withdrawal looms
Updated 23 min 12 sec ago
Follow

WHO facing ‘new realities’ as US withdrawal looms

WHO facing ‘new realities’ as US withdrawal looms
  • “We regret the announcement by the United States of its intention to withdraw, and it was also sad to see them participating less this week,” he said

GENEVA: The World Health Organization on Tuesday wrapped up its executive board meeting, held against the backdrop of the United States — by far its largest donor — heading for the exit.
The agenda-setting eight-day gathering at the WHO’s Geneva headquarters wrestled with the impact of US President Donald Trump’s January 20 decision to start the one-year process of withdrawing from the UN health agency.
“We are operating with twin strategic goals: to mobilize resources and to tighten our belts,” WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in his closing remarks.
“We regret the announcement by the United States of its intention to withdraw, and it was also sad to see them participating less this week,” he said.
“I think we all felt their absence. We very much hope they will reconsider and we would welcome the opportunity to engage in constructive dialogue.”
The United States is on the executive board, but made only fleeting contributions throughout the eight-day event.
The board is composed of 34 member states, who nominate a board member who is technically qualified in health.
The board agrees the agenda and resolutions for the decision-making World Health Assembly in May.
“We have had to face new realities, with the announcement of the withdrawal of the US from the WHO,” said Barbados’s health minister Jerome Walcott, the board’s chair, as he closed the meeting.
“Despite the many challenges we faced, we have come together and found agreement on 40 decisions and seven resolutions, which aim to strengthen our work and to enhance good public health.”

If anything, the US move has driven home the need for more secure and reliable funding at WHO, which in recent years has relied heavily on voluntary contributions.
As part of a plan to swell membership fees to cover at least half of the organization’s budget by 2030, the board recommended a 20 percent fee hike.
Boosting membership fees is seen as a way for WHO to reduce its reliance on a handful of major donors and ensure more predictable and flexible finances.
“This is a very strong signal of your support, and it’s a major step toward putting WHO on a more predictable and sustainable financial footing,” Tedros said.
“You said we need to prioritize based on realistic funding. We agree,” he added.
“You said we need to improve efficiency, enhance oversight and reduce unnecessary expenditures. We agree.”
Last week, the board also re-adopted a resolution on responding to the health conditions in the Palestinian territories.
The total planned costs required to implement the decision were given as $648 million, including $275 million for emergency response and $265 million for early recovery and rehabilitation.
Other topics discussed by the board included non-communicable diseases, mental health, skin diseases, environmental health, air pollution, the global health workforce, substandard and falsified medicines, maternal and newborn health, health emergencies, and universal health coverage.
 

 


Why Trump’s proposal on Gaza is ringing alarm bells in the region

Why Trump’s proposal on Gaza is ringing alarm bells in the region
Updated 33 min 21 sec ago
Follow

Why Trump’s proposal on Gaza is ringing alarm bells in the region

Why Trump’s proposal on Gaza is ringing alarm bells in the region
  • Egyptian authorities have publicly rejected the idea of displacement of Palestinians on human rights grounds
  • From the earliest days of the Gaza war, Arab governments, particularly Egypt and Jordan, have said Palestinians must not be driven from land where they want to make a future state, which would include the occupied West Bank and Gaza

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump has infuriated the Arab world by saying that Palestinians would not have the right of return to the Gaza Strip under his proposal to redevelop the enclave, which has been devastated by an Israeli offensive. From the earliest days of the Gaza war, Arab governments, particularly Egypt and Jordan, have said Palestinians must not be driven from land where they want to make a future state, which would include the occupied West Bank and Gaza. Trump first suggested on January 25 that Egypt and Jordan should take in Palestinians from Gaza, a proposal they strongly oppose. In a shock announcement on February 4, after meeting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington, Trump proposed resettling Gaza’s 2.2 million Palestinians and the US taking control and ownership of the demolished seaside enclave, redeveloping it into the “Riviera of the Middle East.”
On February 10, he said Palestinians would not have the right of return to Gaza under his plan, contradicting his own officials who had suggested Gazans would only be relocated temporarily. Trump’s plan touches on one of the most sensitive issues in the Arab-Israeli conflict, the right of Palestinians to return. Trump, known as a tough dealmaker in his earlier career as a property developer in New York, said that he believed he could persuade Jordan and Egypt to take in displaced Palestinians. He also said Palestinians could be resettled in “much better housing.”
Many of Gaza’s buildings have turned into rubble since the war between Hamas and Israel erupted on October 7, 2023.
Trump’s plans are likely to heighten fears among Palestinians in Gaza of being driven out of the coastal strip, and stoke concern in Arab states that have long worried about the destabilising impact of any such exodus.

WHAT IS BEHIND THE CONCERNS?
Palestinians have long been haunted by what they call the “Nakba,” or catastrophe, when 700,000 of them were dispossessed from their homes during the war that surrounded the creation of Israel in 1948.
Many were driven out or fled to neighboring Arab states, including to Jordan, Syria and Lebanon, where many of them and their descendants still live in refugee camps. Some went to Gaza. Israel disputes the account that they were forced out.
Today about 5.6 million Palestinian refugees — mainly the descendants of those who fled — currently live in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Gaza. About half of registered refugees remain stateless, according to the Palestinian foreign ministry, many living in crowded camps.
Trump’s talk of resettling some two million Gazans is a nightmare for Jordan, which has long feared the mass expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza and the West Bank, and echoes a vision long propagated by right-wing Israelis of Jordan as an alternative Palestinian home.
The anxiety dates back to what is known as Black September. In 1970 the Jordanian army launched a huge offensive by that name to retake control of territory occupied by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) in Jordan.
King Hussein, fearing the growing influence of Palestinian factions, cracked down on Palestinian nationalists. His generals ordered tanks into the capital Amman. Over 3,000 Palestinians were estimated killed and some 20,000 fled Jordan.
The latest conflict, currently paused amid a fragile ceasefire agreement, has seen an unprecedented Israeli bombardment and land offensive in Gaza, devastating urban areas.
Most Gazans have been displaced several times in Israel’s offensive, launched after the 2023 attack on Israel by Hamas that killed 1,200 people, according to Israeli tallies.
More than 48,000 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to Palestinian health officials.

HOW HAVE PALESTINIANS MOVED DURING THIS CONFLICT?
Before Israel launched its offensive in 2023, it told Palestinians in north Gaza to move to what it said were safe areas in the south. As the offensive expanded, Israel told them to head further south toward Rafah, on the border with Egypt.
Later in the war, before launching a campaign in Rafah, it instructed them to move to a new designated humanitarian zone in Al-Mawasi, an area that stretches 12 km (7 miles) along the coast, starting from the western areas of Deir Al-Balah in central Gaza to Khan Younis and Rafah in the south.
According to UN estimates, up to 85 percent of the population of Gaza — one of the world’s most densely populated areas — have already been displaced from their homes.

COULD A MAJOR DISPLACEMENT FROM GAZA HAPPEN?
Many Palestinians in Gaza have said they would not leave the enclave even if they could because they fear it might lead to another permanent displacement in a repeat of 1948.
Egyptian authorities have publicly rejected the idea of displacement of Palestinians on human rights grounds.
The most populous Arab country would also be wary of hosting hundreds of thousands of Palestinians potentially including members of Hamas, after years of crackdowns on domestic Islamists such as the Muslim Brotherhood, which had close ties to Hamas.
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi has shown no tolerance for Islamists. He views them as an existential threat to his country and thousands of Islamist militants have been imprisoned.

WHAT HAVE ISRAEL’S GOVERNMENT AND ITS POLITICIANS SAID?
Israel’s then-Foreign Minister Israel Katz, now serving as defense minister, said on February 16, 2024, that Israel had no plans to deport Palestinians from Gaza. Israel would coordinate with Egypt on Palestinian refugees and find a way to not harm Egypt’s interests, Katz added.
However, comments by some in the Israeli government have stoked Palestinian and Arab fears of a new Nakba. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has repeatedly called for a policy of “encouraging the migration” of Palestinians from Gaza and for Israel to impose military rule in the territory.

 


Bellingham strikes late for Real Madrid in 3-2 win at Man City in Champions League 1st leg playoff

Bellingham strikes late for Real Madrid in 3-2 win at Man City in Champions League 1st leg playoff
Updated 42 min 57 sec ago
Follow

Bellingham strikes late for Real Madrid in 3-2 win at Man City in Champions League 1st leg playoff

Bellingham strikes late for Real Madrid in 3-2 win at Man City in Champions League 1st leg playoff
  • Bellingham sealed a stunning comeback for holder Madrid in the first leg at the Etihad Stadium after City had led 2-1 late on

MANCHESTER, England: Jude Bellingham struck in stoppage time to give Real Madrid a 3-2 victory in its Champions League playoff against Manchester City on Tuesday.
Bellingham sealed a stunning comeback for holder Madrid in the first leg at the Etihad Stadium after City had led 2-1 late on.
Former City academy player Brahim Diaz had leveled the game at 2-2 in the 86th minute before Bellingham’s late winner silenced the home crowd.
City had looked like taking a lead into the second leg at the Bernabeu next week after two goals from Erling Haaland.
His penalty in the 80th had given City the edge after Kylian Mbappe had canceled out the Norwegian’s first half goal after the break.
Paris Saint-Germain took a big step toward the Champions League round of 16 by beating Brest 3-0 in a first-leg playoff match.
Ousmane Dembélé scored twice and Vitinha converted a penalty to put the French champion in control.
Having made hard work of the new-look league phase of the tournament, it would take a major upset in the second leg in Paris to deny PSG a place in the next round.
The Qatar-backed PSG is one of the wealthiest clubs in the world, but was in danger of early elimination before securing the lifeline of a playoff by finishing 15th in the 36-team league.
Perfect 10
Dembélé’s double saw him score for a 10th game in a row, with 18 goals during that streak.
It was from his shot that led to PSG’s 21st-minute penalty after Pierre Lees-Melou handled in the area. Vitinha converted the spot kick.
After Brest striker Abdallah Sima headed a corner against the post, Dembélé got his first goal in the 45th when he broke free down the right and curled a shot inside the post.
His second came in the 66th when he pounced on a loose ball and burst into the penalty area to score his 23rd goal of the season.


‘Hell worse than what we have already?’ Gazans reject Trump plans

‘Hell worse than what we have already?’ Gazans reject Trump plans
Updated 10 min 25 sec ago
Follow

‘Hell worse than what we have already?’ Gazans reject Trump plans

‘Hell worse than what we have already?’ Gazans reject Trump plans
  • Under Trump’s scheme, Gaza’s about 2.2 million Palestinians would be resettled and the United States would take control and ownership of the coastal territory, redeveloping it into the “Riviera of the Middle East”
  • Any suggestion that Palestinians leave Gaza — which they want to be part of an independent state also encompassing the West Bank with East Jerusalem as its capital — has been anathema to the Palestinian leadership for generations

CAIRO/RAMALLAH/GAZA: With his Gaza home destroyed in Israel’s military offensive, Shaban Shaqaleh had intended to take his family on a break to Egypt once the Hamas-Israel ceasefire was firmly in place.
He changed his mind after US President Donald Trump announced plans to resettle Gaza’s Palestinian residents and redevelop the enclave, and said they should not have the right to return.
The Tel Al-Hawa neighborhood in Gaza City, where dozens of multi-story buildings once stood, is now largely deserted. There is no running water or electricity and, like most buildings there, Shaqaleh’s home is in ruins.
“We are horrified by the destruction, the repeated displacement and the death, and I wanted to leave so I can secure a safe and better future for my children — until Trump said what he said,” Shaqaleh, 47, told Reuters via a chat app.
“After Trump’s remarks I canceled the idea. I fear leaving and never being able to come back. This is my homeland.”
Palestinians fear that Trump’s plan would enforce another Nakba, or Catastrophe, when they experienced mass expulsions in 1948 with the creation of Israel.
Under Trump’s scheme, Gaza’s about 2.2 million Palestinians would be resettled and the United States would take control and ownership of the coastal territory, redeveloping it into the “Riviera of the Middle East.”
“The idea of selling my home or the piece of land I own to foreign companies to leave the homeland and never come back is completely rejected. I am deeply rooted in the soil of my homeland and will always be,” Shaqaleh said.
Any suggestion that Palestinians leave Gaza — which they want to be part of an independent state also encompassing the West Bank with East Jerusalem as its capital — has been anathema to the Palestinian leadership for generations. Neighbouring Arab states have rejected it since the Gaza war began in 2023.

SATURDAY DEADLINE
After Hamas said on Monday it was suspending the release of Israeli hostages set out in the ceasefire deal due to alleged Israeli violations, Trump said the Palestinian militant group should release all those it still holds by noon on Saturday or he would propose canceling the truce and “let hell break out.”
“Hell worse than what we have already? Hell worse than killing?” said Jomaa Abu Kosh, a Palestinian from Rafah in southern Gaza, standing beside devastated homes.
One woman, Samira Al-Sabea, accused Israel of blocking aid deliveries, a charge denied by Israel.
“We are humiliated, street dogs are living a better life than us,” she said. “And Trump wants to make Gaza hell? This will never happen.”
Israel began its assault on Gaza after the Hamas-led attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, that killed about 1,200 people while some 250 were taken hostage, according to Israeli tallies.
The operation has killed more than 48,000 Palestinians, by Gaza authorities’ counts, and obliterated much of the enclave.
Some Gazans said Palestinian leaders must find a solution to their problems.
“We don’t want to leave our country but also need a solution. Our leaders — Hamas, the PA (Palestinian Authority) and other factions — must find a solution,” said a 40-year-old carpenter who gave his name as Jehad.

’DOES HE OWN GAZA?“
In the occupied West Bank, Palestinians were also aghast at Trump’s words.
“Does he own Gaza to ask people to leave it?” said Nader Imam. “Regarding Trump I only blame the American people. How can a country like this, a superpower, accept a person like Trump? His statements are savage.”
“What will Trump do? There is no fear, we rely on God,” said another West Bank resident, Mohammed Salah Tamimi.
The proposal shattered decades of US peace efforts built around a two-state solution and added pressure on neighboring Egypt and Jordan to take in resettled Palestinians.
Both countries, who receive billions in aid from the United States, rejected the plan citing concerns for national security and their commitment to the two-state solution.
For Jordan, which borders the West Bank and has absorbed more Palestinians than any other state since Israel’s creation, the plan is a nightmare.
Trump said he might withhold aid to Jordan and Egypt if they refused to cooperate. Jordan’s King Abdullah is set to meet Trump in Washington on Tuesday and is expected to express his rejection of the plan.
“Jordan can never accept resolving this issue at its expense.” said Suleiman Saud, the chairman of the Palestine Committee in Jordan’s House of Representatives. “Jordan is for Jordanians, and Palestine is for Palestinians.”

 


Friends of Italian priest long missing in Syria hope for news

Friends of Italian priest long missing in Syria hope for news
Updated 12 February 2025
Follow

Friends of Italian priest long missing in Syria hope for news

Friends of Italian priest long missing in Syria hope for news
  • Tens of thousands of people have been detained or gone missing in Syria during more than a decade of conflict, many disappearing into Assad’s jails

NABEK, Syria: In a centuries-old monastery on a rocky hill north of Damascus, friends of missing Italian priest Paolo Dall’Oglio carry on his legacy, hopeful Bashar Assad’s ouster might help reveal the Jesuit’s fate.
“We want to know if Father Paolo is alive or dead, who imprisoned him, and what was his fate,” said Father Jihad Youssef who heads Deir Mar Musa Al-Habashi, about 100 kilometers (62 miles) north of Damascus.
For years, Dall’Oglio lived in Deir Mar Musa — the monastery of St. Moses the Ethiopian — which dates to around the 6th century. He is credited with helping restore the place of worship.
A fierce critic of Assad, whose 2011 repression of anti-government protests sparked war, he was exiled the following year for meeting with opposition members, returning secretly to opposition-controlled areas in 2013.
He disappeared that summer while heading to the Raqqa headquarters of a group that would later become known as the Daesh, to plead for the release of kidnapped activists.
Conflicting reports emerged on Dall’Oglio’s whereabouts, including that he was kidnapped by the extremists, killed or handed to the Syrian government.
Daesh’s territorial defeat in Syria in 2019 brought no new information.
Tens of thousands of people have been detained or gone missing in Syria during more than a decade of conflict, many disappearing into Assad’s jails.
His December overthrow has enabled his friends at the monastery to openly discuss suspicions Dall’Oglio might have been “imprisoned by the regime,” Youssef said.
“We waited to see a sign of him... in Saydnaya prison or Palestine Branch,” Youssef said, referring to notorious detention facilities from which detainees were released after Assad’s toppling.
“We were told a lot of things, including that he was seen in the Adra prison in 2019,” Youssef said, referring to another facility outside Damascus, “but nothing reliable.”

Dall’Oglio, born in 1954, hosted interfaith seminars at Deir Mar Musa where Syria’s Christian minority and Muslims used to pray side by side, turning the monastery into a symbol of coexistence.
Youssef said it became a bridge for dialogue between Syrians in a country that “the former regime divided into sects who feared each other.”
Some 30,000 people visited in 2010, but the war and Dall’Oglio’s disappearance scared them away for more than a decade.
The monastery reopened for visitors in 2022.
“I didn’t know Father Paolo,” said Shatha Al-Barrah, 28, who came to Deir Mar Musa seeking solace and reflection.
But “I know he reflects this monastery, which opens its heart to all people from all faiths,” said the interpreter as she climbed the 300 steps leading to the building, built on the ruins of a Roman tower and partly carved into the rock.
Julian Zakka said Dall’Oglio was one of the reasons he joined the Jesuit order.
“Father Paolo used to work against associating Islam with extremists,” said the 28-year-old, “and to emphasize that coexistence is possible.”

After Islamist-led rebels ended half a century of one-family rule, the new authorities have sought to reassure minorities that they will be protected.
Assad had presented himself as a protector of minorities in multi-ethnic, multi-confessional Syria, but largely concentrated power in the hands of the Alawite community to whom his family belonged.
This month, Jesuits in Syria emphasized the need for healing, noting in a statement that fear had “shackled” the community for years.
Youssef said that while “the regime presented itself as protecting us, in fact it was using us as protection.”
He expressed optimism that “at last, the load has been lifted from our chests and we can breathe” after decades of “political death,” adding that he hoped the new authorities would be inclusive.
For now, Youssef is intent on spreading Dall’Oglio’s message.
“We will return to organizing activities like he loved to do,” Youssef said, including a march in Homs province, home to Alawites, Sunni and Shiite Muslims.
“The regime caused deep wounds between the Islamic sects” in Homs, he said.
“Father Paolo wanted to organize a large procession there — to pray at the mass graves, to be a bridge between people — to let them listen to each other’s pain, grieve and cry together, and stand hand in hand.”